When facing a health or safety risk, which change model is most effective?

The breakthrough change model is particularly effective when dealing with health or safety risks because it focuses on significant, transformative shifts rather than incremental adjustments. In scenarios where the stakes are high, such as in health and safety contexts, merely making small changes may not sufficiently address the underlying issues or might not yield the rapid improvements needed.

Breakthrough change encourages a comprehensive and innovative approach, often incorporating new ideas, technologies, and strategic changes that can lead to substantial improvements. This can be essential in situations where immediate action is necessary to prevent harm or enhance safety protocols. Implementing a breakthrough change framework allows organizations to re-evaluate their systems and processes critically, leading to a more robust response to significant risks.

In contrast, models like the AKDAR Method or the Incremental Change approach typically focus on gradual adjustments or individual behavior changes, which might not be sufficient in urgent health or safety scenarios. The Kubler-Ross Cycle of Grief, while significant in understanding emotional responses, does not directly offer a model for addressing health and safety changes effectively. Thus, the breakthrough change model is best suited for tackling urgent and impactful issues in these fields.